Advice Received 1-26-10

"You have to be careful of your brand, Yifei. Especially in an online world, word travels fast."

Insightful criticism is rare. Most people don't care enough or aren't perceptive enough to give it.

"You did the food thing. Then you did shirts. Now HubSpot. You need to stop attempting."

But good, insightful criticism is like the air horn that wakes you up as you start to fall asleep at the wheel. It puts things back into context.

"You need to deliver."

***

Thank-you.

Duly noted.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Brand   Execution   Wisdom  

Comments [1]

Becoming One With Paul Graham

My recent project to imitate the styles of writers I admire has come up against a roadblock: I've been finding it frustratingly hard to create satisfactory work.

Turns out, identifying word choices and patterns was only the tip of the iceberg.

Consider this: every conscious thought that passes through your head is actually a sentence. These sentences are spoken in your mind's awareness - annotating every experience as you live it. Needless to say, each person's voice is different.

In writing, it's this internal "scribe" that is at work - and the goal of writing is to authentically channel this voice onto an external medium.

Which reveals the challenge of adopting someone else's style. Any writing that is used as a base example for imitation is only a contextual snapshot of the author's mind. Truly embracing a style would still require a deep understanding of the author's thought processes. This doesn't mean it can't be done, but it will require a different approach.

If what I've concluded is true, then good writing isn't so much about writing skills as it is about thinking skills. Clarity of thought will translate itself clearly onto paper. The same goes for hazy thoughts.

This realization effectively reframes the focus of my project. The goal isn't just to write like the authors I admire, but to think like them - to see the world as they do. If I can accomplish that, then it will no longer be imitation of someone else's voice, but my voice and mine alone.

Photo courtesy of Muffet
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Psychology   Writing  

Comments [1]

#FFP - An Idea for Twitter

From now on, I'll be tweeting at #ffp (Follow Friday Plus) every Friday to highlight one person I enjoy following and including a good reason why.

Right now, the Follow Friday lists are cool, but they're just that: lists. They don't give any good incentive for someone to actually follow. I'm a Twitter newbie and would love to see more quick, compelling recommendations for folks I should connect with.

So let's get it started. Every Friday, choose just one person and pimp them out under #ffp. That's it. :)

Who's with me?!

-Yifei

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [4]

To Rule the World... Or Save It?

I attended a Rule 53 event tonight with US Senate candidate Alan Khazei. His anecdote about the necessity of money in order to make a difference in the nonprofit sector particularly struck me - and forced me to revisit a topic that I haven't though upon in a long time. 

Assume you're a young person who wants to change the world. You're smart, confident, and have great potential.

Should you aim to become rich and powerful, so as to one day pull the strings?

Or should you devote your time to a more "noble" cause?

This is the dilemma that I personally face, and I'm certainly not alone here. 

Unfortunately, there is no closure to this post... I don't have a full answer. I do, however, have a movie recommendation.


(Watch it at SnagFilms for free.)

The film is not a true documentary in that it centers on the experiences of fictitious characters - two recent Yale graduates as they seek to map out the American socioeconomic landscape. But the interviews are candid and eye-opening.

Contributors include the late Kurt Vonnegut, Walter Cronkite, and top-shelf names from all corners of economic influence. It won't answer your questions per sec, but it'll provide valuable perspective from otherwise difficult-to-access individuals.

Watch the documentary, then come talk to me. I would love to hear your reaction.

---

There is, in afterthought, a third option. Which is to ask, "Why do I even need to make a difference?" 

This is epitomized by the growing trend of "lifestyle designers" who have quit their day jobs in favor of starting companies or writing books teaching people how to quit their day jobs (I'm being harsh here, but just take a look).

The real question I see here: Is personal happiness/freedom a meaningful enough goal? If I disappear into the Maui sunset, is that a good use of my life?

Or is it a selfish waste of human potential?  

To be continued...
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Documentary   Money   Politics   Self  

Comments [1]

Life is like a box of… Lean Startup



Eric Ries is somewhat of a rockstar among software engineers and entrepreneurs. Which is to say… “relatively obscure.” ;)

Kidding of course. I attended his talk at MIT yesterday and learned plenty from his accounts of managing different software startups. But I think it’s important to note that his “lessons learned” apply beyond the scope of technology and business.

Think about this: the perspective of a recent college graduate is very similar to that of a startup founder.

  • What is your key value?
  • What opportunities should you pursue?
  • What does life look like in 5 years?!

I’ve gone through both situations in the past year and a half, and can attest that they have a tangible similarity.

So here’s what I wish I knew 18 months ago:

The true metric of success is learning. When you know the problem and you know the solution, success is measured by your ability to address the problem with the solution. Simple.

But when you don’t know the problem and you don’t know the solution… then success is measured by what you learn. In the lean startup, that means understanding the needs of the customer. For a graduate, that means understanding the needs of his immediate pool of opportunities.

Test traditional assumptions… and test your own. Traditionally, software is updated one big batch at a time over a process that takes months of preparation. Eric has his team update 50 times a day, and found that it was a better (albeit controversial) way to achieve success (see above).

Most of us consider ourselves individuals with free will, but I find that this is often not the case. Many people “go with the flow” and defer to conventions, whether out of fear or a feeling of obligation. But that doesn't mean traditional is better.

On the flipside, the individuals who are bold enough to challenge tradition in the first place are often self-assured to the point of fault. So there needs to be a certain component of doublethink involved – where you are 100% confident in your success but humble enough to “pivot” and change course.

Applied to our dear graduate, should he accept that golden ticket to law school or a job offer? Is it something he wants to do or feel like he "should" do? And can he keep grounded enough in the process to continue learning and adjusting?

Finally, good systems are beautiful. Rough Eric paraphrase: “For many of us in startups, rules and regulations seem like the inefficient artifacts of large corporations. But really, rules represent discipline. A system exists to make the process more efficient.”

Not all systems achieve that goal, of course. But a good system is essential to producing consistent results, consistent progress. How you build that system, though, is up to you. I remember I had a beast of a time management system in college. Multiple colors. Obscure symbols. Important sounding deadlines.

Today I just use post it notes. But it's the only thing that keeps me productive during the day... A good system.


That’s my $.02 on Lean Philosophy.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Philosophy   Self  

Comments [0]

No Country for Young Men #2

Some recent conversations have me thinking about the nature of being a young person in today's world. I broadly characterize Generation Y (myself included) in three words: 

Blinded by opportunity.


Like a wide-eyed toddler lost in Times Square, Gen Y is bombarded with stimuli, uncertain of direction, ever curious, ever ambitious, but afraid to move lest any exciting object pass him by.

Put simply, it's a prolific development in the paradox of choice. At supermarkets, we sift through thousands of weakly differentiated brands. Our career lives consist of keeping one foot in the door, one eye out for better opportunities. And living in cities, we shake hands and jump into bed with more people than we can ever really get to know. 

None of these are inherently terrible. But collectively, there's a danger.

The fundamental flaw is that we're wired to seek out the best - to consider every option before making a decision. But with so much abundance, our biological programming is no longer valid.

To me, this explains many of the social phenomenon we face today: everything from voter turnout, to divorce rates, to unemployed college grads.

We are digital natives in analog bodies.

And nature still has the last word.

The action step? I think it begins with self-awareness. That opens the doors for self-diagnosing limiting behaviors, refocusing on core values, and committing to a course of action.

But take that with a grain of salt.

To be continued...
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Philosophy   Self   Wisdom  

Comments [1]

The New Purpose of this Blog

I just got home from a 3 hour dinner with my friend Morgan and a few other very cool folks from Northeastern. Probably the most intellectually stimulating conversation I've had in months... covering everything from the girls to economic models to government policy to existential life philosophy. I love conversations like that. And I needed the mental release.

But walking home from the T, with the streets to myself and my mind still churning, I couldn't get over one thing: Besides the mental stimulation from debate, the net output of tonight's activities was... what? No notes jotted. No plans drafted. No action taken.

No tangible result. And that doesn't sit well with me.

So to bring it back to this blog:

Previously, "The Back Pocket" contained some interesting, semi-philosophical posts about various things that I'm interested in. Similar to the junk that ends up one's back pocket (or purse, or whatever).

Going forward, I'm renaming it, "Action Items." This isn't some GTD ploy, nor is it a social experiment, nor do I have any big plans for the blog in the future. It is a mere reminder of a philosophy that I've come to measure myself by.

And to live up to that, I aim to write posts that are more actionable for myself and others.

If you're reading this, thank-you. If you've been following along, thank-you twice. Friend or stranger, please feel free to comment. 
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Announcements  

Comments [0]

A Taste of Venture Capital

Last night I had the pleasure of attending the first episode of Capitalize! - a new show by DartBoston that takes young startups into the boardrooms of venture capital firms for a firsthand look at real pitches to a VC. This time around, it was Kabir Hemrajani, founder of RiotVine, pitching to David Beisel of Venrock.

Other folks will do a much better job than I at giving the play-by-plays. I'm here to speculate on the one thing that's been circulating in my own mind:

What it must be like to be in the shoes of a VC.

Tonight's experience at Venrock has definitely helped me demystify the profession to some degree. After the show, I asked David about what attracted him to VC, and his passionate answer (watch it a approximately 1:14:00) shed a lot of light on the intrinsic motivation behind it all - something that gets less airtime than the "making money" aspect, but nevertheless seems to be a major component.

To summarize, here's a guy who's passionate about startups. Been there himself before. Has a blog that I'll definitely be checking out more of. What VC seems to offer David is the experience of working with several startups at the same time, experiencing the same highs and lows -- basically, allowing him to continue doing what he loves across a wider playing field.

And that's pretty damn cool.

Whether my future crosses path with the VC world or not, Capitalize! has given me deeper respect and understanding of what their world looks like. 

BIG thanks to David, Cort, Jake, and the rest of the Dart Community for making this possible. Also a shout out to Microsoft Cambridge who sponsored the event, and of course, congrats to Kubir for a job well done.

Watch the show here:

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/2530167

(Will posterous auto embed this bad boy? Let's find out...)
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   DartBoston   VC  

Comments [0]

Hooked on Speed

Does a person every really stop growing?

The answer, from my limited experience, is NO. The magnitude of human potential seems close to infinite, but perhaps that’s just because I haven’t yet approached my limits.


Perhaps growth should be broken down into two categories: achievements and ability. Achievements are the story of your life and fortunately, only limited by time. 

But what about ability? The typical credentials for measuring ability often lose their significance at the highest levels - because ability becomes too close to call. Who’s the best supermodel in the world? The best businessman?

In these cases, we either submit to subjectivity (“Adriana Lima, obviously.”) or invent objective criterion (“Bill Gates - he was the richest.”). But neither helps us measure true ability.

Could it be that these individuals have reached their highest potential (in their respective fields) and that people, at their highest levels, are equally able? Or are we just terribly inept at judging this trait?

Someday, I'll know.
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Philosophy   Potential  

Comments [0]

The Zen of HTML and Legal Contracts

On the path of bootstrapping a startup, I’ve had a fair share of experience coding websites and drafting legal documents. These experiences have made me appreciate a side of both activities that I previously hadn’t thought much about:

Creativity within structure.

Coding and contracts are basically just languages – like any other language conceived by people. They each contain their own unique set of nouns, verbs, patterns, and nuances.

But coding and legal-ese are different from most in that they are characterized by extremely rigid formalities and limitations on usage. The purpose of this is to maintain some degree of consistency across each field. 

You might think that a highly structured, uncompromising language takes away the author’s ability to be creative.

(And here’s where my realization comes:)

It doesn’t.

Ask an experienced web developer about “elegant code” and you’ll be treated to a passionate monologue about form and functionality, succinctness, and clean documentation.

I haven’t had a similar conversation with a lawyer (I can’t afford it), but my guess is that there is a similar reverence for the “elegant contract” – the one that uses a few words as possible to deliver the maximum effect, written in language that ordinary mortals can understand.

My present experience tells me that boundaries are actually conducive to creativity. Presented with limitations and challenges, smart individuals are going to find ways to make the best of what they have. And those results can oftentimes be beautiful.

The greater lesson here is that within every craft, there is an art form. 

Within every seemingly mundane chore is a medium for expression.

It's just a choice we each have to make.
Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Coding   Creativity   Legal   Wisdom  

Comments [1]

About

Dissatisfied student leaves college, discovers love for entrepreneurship. Real learning ensues.

Essays about business, education, and Generation Y.

More at:
http://yifeizhang.com

 

About ⇓